He says they were removed from the film when it was process at Kodak’s “Hawkeyeworks” R&D lab, in Rochester, New York, the weekend after JFK’s assassination. Horne argues these frames depicted JFK hit by gunfire from multiple directions. Horne argues that the alteration of the film removed images of the presidential limousine making a brief but definite stop when the shots rang out. Those who scoff at the idea that the film was altered need to address Brugioni’s comments. Yet his cogent and detailed comments do exactly that. He has no conceivable interest in fostering doubts about the authenticity of the Zapruder film and every reason not to. He headed the CIA’s National Photographic Interpretation Center for decades. Yet Brugioni is a highly credible source, to say the least. Many will scoff at such statements as conspiratorial foolishness. Brugioni viewed the Zapruder film not long after it was delivered to the CIA on November 23, 1963, and he recalls seeing imagery that does not appear in the film that is now in the National Archives. Thanks to Doug Horne’s interview with Dino Brugioni, the CIA’s leading photo analyst, I have had to revisit my previous skepticism.
It is one reason why I no longer dismiss the idea that Abraham Zapruder’s film of JFK’s assassination was altered. Watch this video, especially at the 1:19 mark.
0 kommentar(er)
